Woodturning Sea Urchin Style Multi Axis Ornament

Ornament in Lilac

This video is also posted on YouTube, Vimeo, and FaceBook. Best Right Here!

At our club’s Christmas social, I gave away my ornament made as a faux sea urchin. I had promised my wife to make another. However, the process to turn the original was difficult with catastrophic breakage very likely.

I struggled to modify the process to improve the results and satisfy my wife. I think I finally succeeded.

The original process required carving. However, in the modified process, carving is optional. I think the wood is light enough that carving is not required.

I used green lilac for this ornament. The wet wood tools nicely and dries in a couple of days. The ornament body is finished with rattle-can lacquer. The cherry finials are finished with shellac friction polish.

I plan to invite subscribers to more of these remote demonstrations maybe even after this covid pandemic is over. However, I can only invite those who have subscribed on my website – AsWoodTurns.com. If you have subscribed via YouTube, I don’t have a way to email an invite. If you already receive my weekly emails, you’re already subscribed.

But you can remedy this by going to the box in the upper right hand corner of this page. Green and tan. Please use this automatic process instead of email. On a phone, the box may be in a different place – try swiping left or right to find it.

Then you can participate in a demonstration via the internet on your own computer screen. Social distancing overcome! and Front Row seating at the demo.

Enjoy!

Resources:
Multi Axis Woodturning Ribbed and Holey
This Christmas Ornament is Not A Sea Urchin


3 Responses to “Woodturning Sea Urchin Style Multi Axis Ornament”

  1. Jack Thompson says:

    Great ornament and also great Pandemic haircut.

  2. Karl Miller says:

    Alan – I know you have mentioned the formula for turning a sphere with several different projects, but you did it so quickly I was unable to write it down. Can you send the formula to me?

    Thanks,
    Karl